Helicopter Parenting, Emotional Regulation, and Mental Health among University Students

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71016/hnjss/q4ag8q88

Keywords:

Helicopter Parenting, Emotional Regulation, Mental Health, University Students

Abstract

Aim of the Study: This study investigated the relationship between helicopter parenting, emotional regulation, and mental health among university students.

Methodology: Cross-Sectional Survey Research Design was used to gather data. University Students were the targeted population for the study. Participants were recruited through a random sampling technique. A Random Convenient sampling technique was used to collect data.

Findings: The findings of this study showed that there is a non-significant relationship between helicopter parenting and mental health. It shows that living areas have little bearing on a university student's ability to control their emotions or maintain good mental health. Results imply that university students are emotionally affected based on gender. Findings have also indicated that helicopter parenting, emotional regulation, and mental health do not have significant differences in urban and rural areas.   

Conclusion: It was concluded that there is a non-significant relationship between helicopter parenting, emotional regulation, and mental health.

Author Biographies

  • Mehwish Asif, International Institute of Science, Arts and Technology, Gujranwala, Pakistan.

    Student, Department of Clinical Psychology,

  • Ali Imran Zafar Kahlon, International Institute of Science, Arts and Technology, Gujranwala, Pakistan.

    Assistant Professor, Department of Clinical Psychology,

  • Dr. Muneeb Ahmed Toor, International Institute of Science, Arts and Technology, Gujranwala, Pakistan.

    Assistant Professor, Department of Clinical Psychology,

Downloads

Published

2024-09-22

How to Cite

Asif, M., Kahlon, A. I. Z., & Toor, M. A. (2024). Helicopter Parenting, Emotional Regulation, and Mental Health among University Students. Human Nature Journal of Social Sciences, 5(3), 165-172. https://doi.org/10.71016/hnjss/q4ag8q88